State Adapter (rules + money layer)
Civics | adapter | Updated 2026-02-26
Tags
civics, playbook, adapter
States control a lot of “the rules of the game” and the money pipelines. If local is the steering wheel, state is often the engine and the speed limits.
What counts as “state”
- State legislature (house/senate)
- Governor / executive agencies
- Attorney general
- State boards (licensing, education, utilities)
- State courts (interpretation and enforcement effects)
What state can actually move (the knobs)
Money + formulas
- School funding formulas
- Medicaid / health program administration (varies by state)
- Transportation funding allocation
- Local government aid
Standards + protections
- Labor standards and enforcement resources
- Consumer protection rules
- Insurance regulation and rate review (state-dependent)
- Utility regulation (often state commissions)
Preemption (the big one)
- What locals are allowed to do (housing, labor, environment, policing rules, etc.)
- If you care about local solutions, preemption is either the lock or the key
Housing supply (often decisive)
- Legalizing housing types statewide
- Streamlining approvals / limiting abusive delay tactics
- Funding for infrastructure tied to housing production
The state calendar (how timing works)
- Sessions are seasonal; committee deadlines matter.
- Budget cycles are where leverage concentrates.
- Agencies run rulemaking year-round.
Best core playbooks to pair with state
- 01 One-Ask Engine
- 02 Candidate Evaluation + Feedback (state reps matter a lot)
- 07 Public Comment + Rulemaking (agencies are huge)
- 08 Accountability / Watchdog Lite (follow the money + enforcement)
The “state move” (minimum viable)
- Identify the committee + chair (where bills live or die)
- Make one ask that maps to: rule, budget, or enforcement capacity
- Submit one comment / make one call / attend one hearing
- Follow up once with a measurable request
One-Ask examples (state)
- “Fund X additional inspectors/enforcement staff for [agency] and publish quarterly outcomes.”
- “Require rate review transparency standards and publish approvals/denials.”
- “Limit preemption in [area] so locals can address housing supply.”
- “Adopt a statewide permitting timeline standard for housing.”
Watchouts (state failure modes)
- Bill graveyard: “introduced” is not “moving.” Track committee action.
- Symbolic votes: great press, no implementation. Ask: who enforces?
- Capture risk: boards/commissions can become industry-friendly by default.
What success looks like (state)
- A rule with enforcement teeth
- Money allocated + staffing capacity
- A published metric and reporting requirement
- Preemption reduced (or clarified) so locals can act