Back to blog

Guardrails: Dignity, due process, and the danger of normalization

guardrails | 2026-02-24 | facebook

Dignity and due process are baseline democratic guardrails, and normalization is what weakens them over time.

Receipts

Receipt details are tracked in Methods and Sources by type:

Independent analysis

A simple line should be easy: human dignity, due process, and “no Nazi crap.” When leaders wave off signals and “jokes,” they make room for worse. This is about accountability, not name-calling.

What’s happening

Some signals are meant to be tested in public: slogans, winks, “just joking,” and the slow pressure to shrug and move on.

The danger isn’t one headline. It’s the drip: the cost of speaking up goes up, and the cost of staying quiet goes down.

Why it matters (plain language)

“Normalization” is how a democracy’s immune system gets tired.

If leaders won’t clearly condemn extremist signals and shut them down, they’re effectively saying: this is within bounds now.

That shifts the line for everyone else.

What good looks like

  • A clear, boring standard: dignity and due process apply to everyone
  • Leaders who condemn and stop enabling the crap they know is wrong
  • Institutions that treat extremist flirting as a reputation and safety risk, not “culture war content”

One small action

Pick one place you have influence (work, school, community org) and say it plainly:

“Human dignity and due process aren’t negotiable. And we’re not doing Nazi-adjacent signaling here.”

No speech. No thread war. Just a boundary.

Receipts / context

  • The Atlantic piece on normalization (linked in the original post): (add your canonical link here later)

Back to blog